I am not sure what I can categorize with eugenic.
There are 3 eugenics movements.
1. Fascist. Government decide those who are unworthy and neutralize or sterilize them. Quite often, our smartest subspecies, like the jews, are the one getting slaughtered. I am against this.
2. Techie. My kids can regrow limbs. Okay that’s cool. But it’s kind of freaky and can’t be done on large scale yet. I think it’s people’s right to do so.
3. Libertarianism. Yap simple normal standard libertarianism without even trying to be eugenic. Most of them don’t even think they’re eugenic and hate eugenics.
I believe that the third way will naturally improve humans’ genetic quality as a very nice side effect. Yap the 3rd is actually very eugenic and that’s what I want to explain.
This is the idea that I want to promote. That simple libertarianism have eugenic side effect.
Also many people think that unbridled capitalism will cause war, famine, great disparity of wealth, income inequality, violence, women oppression, etc.
I think the opposite. I think pure libertarianism or at least something closer to libertarianism from what we have now will eliminate poverty, reduce income inequality, reduce war, reduce violent, help the poor, etc. Not that I consider all those goals ideals, but if that’s what ideals for you, libertarianism is the key even for that.
Most people in western civilization think that libertarianism will be disgenic. I think the opposite.
Libertarianism varies but it at least support decriminalization of:
1. Explicit sugar babies agreement (currently illegal due to anti prostitution laws)
2. Consensual women trafficking (currently illegal despite consent under contemporary anti trafficking laws)
3. Porn
4. Drugs or saver drugs like ganja. Pure libertarian support legalization of all drugs and moderate ones support saver drugs like ganja.
5. Buying and selling organs
6. Elimination of welfare program
Pure libertarianism oppose redistribution of wealth at all. Some moderate ones like Milton Friedman advocate negative income tax. Both tend to be eugenic.
Why will this be eugenic?
I think the real reason behind dysgenic tendency doesn’t come from free market. It comes from government.
1. Monogamy actually ration females in equal share for everyone. It ensures the dumbest most stupid and violent males will get a wife anyway. Those males can get females simply because it’s illegal to pick more attractive richer males. Attractive males tend to be best sellers, and quite often already married. Monogamy means women can only pick singles. Also marriage laws are very hostile against the rich. Many rich attractive males simply don’t want to get married. Free sex is simply not toward the best interest of beautiful women that can get tons of financial support for her beauty. Polygamy ration females on the whim of politicians, that get votes from the poor. In Iran, για παράδειγμα, government want to pay cash for those who breed. Sugar babies eliminate this issue and libertarianism will legalize that.
2. Anti women trafficking laws prevent women in countries where they are oppressed from fleeing to better countries with better system and richer males. If women can consensually move, males in every countries will have strong incentive to make their country rich, embrace capitalism, etc. Women will be less oppressed everywhere because otherwise they’ll simply move.
3. Even though most women prefer the rich, not all are pretty enough to get rich males. Καλά, porn will ensure that the ugly don’t get picked.
4. Cheap availability of drugs will give the poor and “fuck up” people something else fun to do besides breeding.
5. If organ selling is legalized, parents can inherit more wealth to their children when they die. Also the rich can live longer and reproduce better.
6. Pure libertarianism opposes welfare. This will obviously very eugenic because it’ll make the poor starve. But pure libertarianism is not even necessary. Currently government spend so much money supporting “our children”, which often is simply not ours, at least not biologically. This provide strong incentive to breed especially among the poor. Welfare recipients deliberately produce many kids so they can collect more food stamps. If government spend the same amount of money for those with kids and those without, that incentive will be reduced.
So what do you think?
Next post would be on why socialism is not necessary and why simple libertarianism will work.
Why Eugenic Measure is Not Necessary and Why Simple Libertarianism Will Work Better is a post from: Ελεύθερη αγορά Forever